Referring to Indigenous peoples as the “bedrock” of sustainability brings with it a dilemma. On one hand, it acknowledges the Indigenous communities’ concern for the environment, on the other, it does so while the same authorities are granting mining, logging, and hydroelectric projects on native lands. Those who fight for their land are often intimidated and prosecuted. If the society does appreciate the Indigenous knowledge, it should first respect ownership, give free and informed consent, and guarantee safety. Otherwise, the term “empowerment” will only be a catchphrase.
True empowerment entails the granting and enforcement of title to the ancestral domain. It also entails the appointment of Indigenous chiefs to the decision-making positions where their authority really matters. It also entails the establishment of community schools that provide education in the local languages and promote the local cultures. Moreover, it also means creating just markets where the artisans receive payment for their work instead of being taken advantage of. This celebration is of no significance if it does not bring about change. Culture is the future's enrichment if the bearers of it can exercise control over their land, resources, and options. Otherwise, it is the same as treating heritage as an ornament, not a right.
References
National Commission on Indigenous Peoples. (n.d.). Republic Act 8371: Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act of 1997.
https://ncip.gov.ph
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018). Indigenous peoples and sustainable development.
https://www.fao.org
UNESCO. (2021). Indigenous knowledge systems for sustainable development.
https://unesco.org
Comments
Post a Comment